THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANSJORG TREICHLER, KENJI TAKABAYASHI,
DIETER H. WOLF and JUTTA HEIM
__________
Appeal No. 1995-2518
Application 07/895,5811
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 51 - 61, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed June 8, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application No. 07/346,670, filed May 3, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007