Ex parte TREICHLER et al. - Page 4




              Appeal No. 1995-2518                                                                                        
              Application 07/895,581                                                                                      


              heterologous protein.  The preferred yeast strain is also described as being defective in at                
              least one protease activity selected from yscA, yscB, yscY and yscS which serves to                         
              further reduce random proteolysis of the protein product.  The invention is said to include                 
              the process of producing the protein, the genetically engineered yeast cells and the                        
              methods of preparing the yeast cells.                                                                       
                                                      Discussion:                                                         

                                                        Claims:                                                           

                     Claim 51 is directed to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain which lacks                                

              carboxypeptidase ysc" acid and lacks proteolytic activity selected from the group                           
              consisting of proteolytic yscA, yscB, yscY and yscS.  The strain has been transformed with                  

              a hybrid vector comprising a S. cerevisiae promotor operably linked to a DNA which will                     

              encode a full-length mature protein having no basic C-terminal amino acids wherein the                      
              protein is selected from the group consisting of hANP, EGF, connective tissue activating                    

              peptide-III and desulphatorhirudin.  Claim 52 is directed to a method of producing a S.                     

              cerevisiae strain claimed in claim 1 and claim 53 is directed to a method of producing a                    

              full-length mature protein using a S. cerevisiae strain claimed in claim 1.                                 

                                        The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                              

                     Claims 51-55 and 57-61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                 
              unpatentable over Bussey taken with Achstetter, Hinnen and Meyhack.                                         
                     Claim 56 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                            

                                                            4                                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007