Appeal No. 1995-2611 Application 07/808,452 DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7, all the claims in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 1. A viral polypeptide having site-specific viral-RNA binding, where said polypeptide is modified to contain a moiety capable of cleaving an RNA backbone. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Corey et al. (Corey), "Generation of a hybrid sequence-specific single-stranded deoxyribonuclease," Science, Vol. 238, pp. 1401-03 (1987) Malim et al. (Malim), "Functional dissection of the HIV-1 Rev trans-activator-derivation of a trans-dominant repressor or Rev function," Cell, Vol. 58, pp. 205-14 (1989) Ebright et al. (Ebright), "Conversion of a helix-turn-helix motif sequence-specific DNA binding protein into a site-specific DNA cleavage agent," Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci., Vol. 87, pp. 2882-86 (1990) Weeks et al. (Weeks), "Fragments of the HIV-1 Tat protein specifically bind Tar RNA," Science, Vol. 249, pp. 1281-85 (1990) Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being non-enabled. The examiner does not rely upon any evidence in support of this rejection. Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Weeks, Malim, Ebright, and Corey. We reverse both rejections. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007