Ex parte SONTHEIMER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1995-2785                                                          
          Application No. 07/576,423                                                    


               26.  A recombinant vector comprising a nucleic acid                      
          segment of that:                                                              
               (a) encodes an amino acid sequence as set forth in                       
                    Figure 2 of the drawing;                                            
               (b) encodes the amino acid sequence phe-lys-glu-gln-phe-                 
                    leu-asp-gly-asp-gly-trp-thr-asp-arg;                                
               (c) encodes the amino acid sequence lys-glu-gln-phe-leu-                 
                    asp-gly-asp-gly-trp-thr-asp-arg-trp-ile-glu-ser; or                 
               (d) that corresponds to, or is complementary to, from a                  
                    14 to 1890 nucleotide long region of the DNA                        
                    sequence of Figure 2 of the drawings, said segment                  
                    being capable of forming a hybrid with the                          
                    nucleotide sequence of Figure 2 under conditions                    
                    that include 6 x SSC at 42EC.                                       


                                    THE REJECTIONS                                      
               In the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 24), the examiner                    
          entered a new ground of rejection of claims 7, 26, and 27                     
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.  That rejection was                   
          withdrawn in the Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper No.                    
          28), page 1, in view of the amendment filed September 12,                     
          1994.                                                                         
               The issues remaining for review are:  (1) whether the                    
          examiner erred in rejecting claims 17 through 19, 21 through                  
          23, 26, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, "as                    
          failing to adequately teach how to make and/or use the                        
                                          -3-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007