Appeal No. 1995-2785
Application No. 07/576,423
invention"; and (2) whether the examiner erred in rejecting
claims 17 through 19, 26, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, "as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which
applicant regards as the invention." See the Examiner's
Answer (Paper No. 24), pages 3 and 4.
In setting forth these rejections, the examiner does not
rely on any prior art references.
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007