THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MURRAY A. KAPLAN, JOSEPH B. BOGARDUS and
ROBERT K. PERRONE
_____________
Appeal No. 1995-3047
Application No. 07/805,7291
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 24,
which are all of the claims in the application.
Claims 1, 8 and 15 are representative:
1Application for patent filed December 6, 1991. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation-in-part of application no. 07/772,641, filed October 8, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of application no. 07/652,454, filed February 7, 1991, now abandoned which is a continuation
of application no. 07/514,261, filed May 1, 1990, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of
application no. 07/352,065, filed May 15, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007