THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLEG WERBITZKY and PHILIPP STUDER
____________
Appeal No. 1995-3054
Application No. 08/059,3841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before DOWNEY, HANLON and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1-16, all of the claims
pending in the application. The claims on appeal are directed
to a process for producing 2-chloro-5-chloromethyl-pyridine.
1 Application for patent filed May 11, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007