THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HIDEKI NAGASHIMA,
RYO ANDO, YASUAKI MAEDA, HIDEO OBATA,
TADAO YOSHIDA, and KAZUHIKO FUJIIE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3185
Application 08/129,0291
______________
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
A final decision was rendered in this case on July 13,
1998, reversing the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9,
and affirming the rejection of claims 7 and 10. On September
17, 1998, the applicants requested rehearing (Paper No. 24).
Application for patent filed September 29, 1993. According to the appellants,1
this is a continuation of application 07/832,021, filed February 6, 1992, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007