THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TETSUYA HIGUCHI, SHUNICHI NOMURA,
SHIGERU ICHIBA, HIROSHI YAMAGUCHI, MASAOMI GOROMARU,
AKIRA WATANABE, KAZUHIRO TAKEDA, MIKIO MORITA,
KAZUHISA FUJITA and YASUYUKI MORIYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 95-3313
Application 08/134,8511
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GRON, and HANLON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
Application for patent filed October 12, 1993.1
According
to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/882,259, filed May 8, 1992, abandoned; which is
a continuation
of Application 07/729,311, filed July 12, 1991, abandoned;
which
is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/492,016, filed
March 12, 1990, abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007