THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HUM M.L. DAVIES, STEVEN R. CHILDERS
and BARBARA BENNETT
__________
Appeal No. 95-3746
Application 08/063,4311
___________
HEARD: February 12, 1999
___________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed May 18, 1993. According to
the appellants the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/851,090, filed March 13, 1992, now Patent
5,262,428, issued November 16, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007