Ex parte PICARD et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-3800                                                          
          Application 08/046,109                                                      


               means operative each time said microprocessor encounters               
          an input or an output instruction in said series of                         
          instructions for causing said microprocessor to access said                 
          special register means and to execute said special                          
          input/output code beginning at said particular address;                     
               whereby said special input/output code is executed by                  
          said microprocessor each time an I/O instruction is executed.               


          The examiner relied on the following reference in the                       
          final rejection:                                                            
          Konopik et al. (Konopik)         4,768,149        Aug. 30,                  
          1988                                                                        
          The examiner cited the following additional references                      
          in                                                                          
          the examiner’s answer:                                                      
          Albright et al. (Albright)       4,727,480        Feb. 23,                  
          1988                                                                        
          Letwin                           5,027,273        June 25,                  
          1991                                                                        
          Although the examiner only discusses claim 13 in the                        
          answer, it is clear that the examiner’s rejections apply                    
          against all the claims.  Claims 13 and 14 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C.  § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of               
          Konopik as set forth in the final rejection.  Claims 15-22                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the               
          teachings of Konopik taken alone as set forth in the final                  
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007