Appeal No. 95-3800 Application 08/046,109 means operative each time said microprocessor encounters an input or an output instruction in said series of instructions for causing said microprocessor to access said special register means and to execute said special input/output code beginning at said particular address; whereby said special input/output code is executed by said microprocessor each time an I/O instruction is executed. The examiner relied on the following reference in the final rejection: Konopik et al. (Konopik) 4,768,149 Aug. 30, 1988 The examiner cited the following additional references in the examiner’s answer: Albright et al. (Albright) 4,727,480 Feb. 23, 1988 Letwin 5,027,273 June 25, 1991 Although the examiner only discusses claim 13 in the answer, it is clear that the examiner’s rejections apply against all the claims. Claims 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Konopik as set forth in the final rejection. Claims 15-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the teachings of Konopik taken alone as set forth in the final 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007