Ex parte IBRAHIM et al. - Page 3




             Appeal No. 95-4321                                                                                       
             Application 07/976,241                                                                                   


             Hartley et al. (Hartley), Chemical Abstracts, Volume 114(25), p242021x (1990)                            
             A reference considered by this panel:                                                                    
                                     3                                                                                
             Fiehring et al.(Fiehring)  -                                                                             
                           German Democratic Republic Patentschrift DD 72 459 April 12, 1970                          



                                             GROUND OF REJECTION                                                      

                    Claims 1-6, 9-11, and 14-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                 
             obviousness, the examiner relies upon Beadle, Barker, Fiehring, and Hartley.                             
                    We affirm-in-part.                                                                                


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          

                    At page 3 of the specification, applicants describe the invention as relating to a                
             method of producing D-tagatose by employing L-arabinose isomerase in the enzymatic                       
             isomerization of D-galactose recovered from the fermentation of a lactose hydrolysate.                   
             The lactose hydrolysate is stated to be derived from cheese whey and/or milk.  Applicants                
             indicate that the D-tagatose is useful as a low calorie sweetener or bulking agent.                      





                    3The examiner in his answer and appellants in their principal and reply briefs have referred to the
             abstract from Chemical Abstracts of Fiehring.  We refer, in our opinion, to a translation of the abstracted
             German Patentschrift and the translation of this document prepared by the PTO Translation Branch, in     
             August 1995, a copy of which is attached to this decision.                                               
                                                          3                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007