THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL MERUELO, GAD LAVIE and YEHUDA MAZUR
____________
Appeal No. 95-4441
Application No. 07/970,2291
____________
HEARD: August 5, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 2, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/883,799 filed May 15, 1992, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/488,518 filed
February 27, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-
part of Application No. 07/417,163 filed October 4, 1989, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/324,177 filed March 16, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007