Appeal No. 95-4441 Application No. 07/970,229 example, in the case of In re Payne, 606 F.2d 303, 313, 203 USPQ 245, 254 (CCPA 1979). More specifically, it would have been obvious for the artisan to replace the methyl substituents of hypericin with hydrogen, thereby yielding the compound of claims 14 and 22, with a reasonable expectation of obtaining a compound possessing antiviral activity. See, for example, In re Zickendraht, 319 F.2d 225, 228, 138 USPQ 22, 25 (CCPA 1963) and compare In re Wood, 582 F.2d 638, 641, 199 USPQ 137, 139 (CCPA 1978). The appellants’ contrary view is based on their position that the antiviral activity under consideration “is exceedingly evanescent” (Reply Brief, page 4) which would not have been expected to remain in eliminating the methyl groups of hypericin. However, we find no evidence of record in support of this position, and the appellants point to none. On the other hand, Lavie’s disclosure of antiviral activity for hypericin and for pseudohypericin supports the proposition that compounds similar in structure will have similar properties even when the involved properties relate to antiviral activity. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007