Appeal No. 95-4473
Application 08/003,894
grounds is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth in the body of this opinion, we reverse the examiner's prior
art rejection of claims 9 through 16, 26, 30 through 32 and 34. We affirm the rejection of
claims 1 through 8, 17 through 25, 27 through 29 and 33. The rejection of claims 35
through 37 on prior art grounds has been dropped. Accordingly, the examiner's decision
is affirmed in part.
AFFIRMED IN PART
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
WILLIAM F. SMITH ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HUBERT C. LORIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007