THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALLISON S. CHANG, JAMES E. BOYD,
RICHARD M. JOHNSON and HAROLD O. KOCH
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4491
Application 07/864,2101
______________
HEARD: March 8, 1999
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, HANLON, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
1Application for patent filed April 3, 1992. According
to applicants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/451,073, filed December 15, 1989; which is a
continuation of Application 06/880,957, filed June 26, 1986,
Abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 06/521,575,
filed August 9, 1983.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007