Ex parte MAJARIAN et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 95-4700                                                                                                              
                 Application 07/837,668                                                                                                          

                 Charbit et al. (Charbit), “Presentation of Two Epitopes of the preS2 Region of Hepatitis B                                      
                 Virus on Live Recombinant Bacteria,” The Journal of Immunology,” Vol. 139, No. 5, pp.                                           
                 1658-64 (1987).                                                                                                                 
                 Kuwajima et al. (Kuwajima), “Presentation of an Antigenic Determinant From Hen Egg-                                             
                 White Lysozyme on the Flagellar Filament of Escherichia Coli,” Bio/Technology, Vol. 6, pp.                                      
                 1080-89 (1988).                                                                                                                 
                 Charbit et al. (Charbit), “Expression of a Poliovirus Neutralization Epitope at the Surface of                                  
                 Recombinant Bacterial: First Immunization Results,” Ann. Inst.Pasteur/Microbiol., Vol. 139,                                     
                 pp. 45-58 (1988).                                                                                                               
                 Ellis et al. (Ellis)              PCT   WO 86/00911                         Feb. 13, 1986                                       
                         Claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, 21, 37, 38, 72 and 73 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                          
                 § 102(e) as anticipated by Asaka.  Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                
                 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Asaka, Macnab and Wei.                                               
                 Claims 8 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness,                                          
                 the examiner relies upon Asaka, Eichinger or Ellis.  Claims 56 through 58 and 61 stand                                          
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon                                           
                 Asaka, Charbit 1987 and Charbit 1988.  Claims 59 and 60 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                          
                 § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Asaka, in view of Charbit                                          
                 1987 or 1988, Macnab and Wei.  Claims 39 through 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                            
                 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Asaka in view of Charbit 1987                                        
                 or 1988, Macnab, Wei and Dougan.  In addition, claims 1 through 11, 21, 37 through 41,                                          
                 56 through 61, 72 and 73 stand rejected under                                                                                   
                 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.                                                                         

                                                                       3                                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007