Appeal No. 95-4700 Application 07/837,668 comprehensive fact-based analysis from the examiner, we do not find that the examiner has discharged her initial burden of establishing reasons why the claims on appeal are indefinite. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is reversed. The decision of the examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) WILLIAM F. SMITH ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) HUBERT C. LORIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007