THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK K. DEBE
____________
Appeal No. 95-4966
Application No. 08/072,1821
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 15 through 18 and 20
through 22, which are the only claims remaining in this
application.
1Application for patent filed June 3, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a division of Application
No. 07/681,332, filed April 5, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,238,729.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007