Appeal No. 95-5092 Application 08/032,581 However, appellants are under no burden of establishing criticality in the absence of a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed invention. The secondary references of Schlauch and Senda do not remedy the basic deficiency of Aldrich discussed above. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) TERRY J. OWENS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) vsh 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007