THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KURT H. J. BUSCHOW, FRANCISCUS H. FEIJEN,
DIRK B. DE MOOIJ and ARJAN NOORDERMEER
____________
Appeal No. 96-0021
Application No. 08/105,8201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, JOHN D. SMITH, and WALTZ,
Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 4 through 9, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed August 11, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007