Ex parte BUSCHOW et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0021                                                          
          Application No. 08/105,820                                                  


               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          method of manufacturing a permanent magnet based on an                      
          intermetallic alloy of neodymium, iron and boron (hereafter                 
          NdFeB) where an alloy of gallium and one or more rare earth                 
          metals is mixed with the NdFeB, magnetically aligned,                       
          compressed, and sintered to produce a magnet with improved                  
          corrosion resistance and increased coercive force (Brief,                   
          pages 1-2).  Claim 6 is illustrative of the subject matter on               
          appeal and is reproduced below:                                             
          6.   A method of manufacturing a permanent magnet comprising                
          NdFeB, said method comprising forming a mixture of a powder of              
          NdFeB and a powder of an alloy consisting in an amount of at                
          least 50% of Ga and at least one rare earth metal in an amount              
          not greater than 50%; magnetically orienting said mixture;                  
          compressing said thus oriented mixture and sintering the                    
          resultant compressed mixture in an oxygen-free atmosphere.                  
               The examiner has relied upon the following references to               
          support the rejections:                                                     
          Ghandehari (Ghandehari ‘574)   4,762,574          Aug. 9, 1988              
          Ghandehari (Ghandehari ‘499)   5,004,499          Apr. 2, 1991              
               Claims 4 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                    
          102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Ghandehari ‘499 (Answer, page 3).              
          Claims 4 through 9 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007