Appeal No. 96-0361
Application 08/288,154
position and to the Brief (Paper No. 18) (pages referred to as
"Br__") for appellants' position.
OPINION
Claims 1-9 and 32
Appellants argue (Br9-10; Br14-15) that Basehore does not
disclose the look-up table limitation of claims 1 and 32.
Claim 1 recites:
a memory having a look-up table stored therein at a
plurality of memory locations, the look-up table being a
compilation of values derived from executing a fuzzy
logic rule base for the sensed state variables, such that
each of said plurality of memory locations stores a value
representative of an output derived from an operation of
the fuzzy logic rule base . . . .
The look-up table limitation in claim 32 is essentially
identical except that it recites "the plurality" in the third
from last line quoted above. Appellants argue that "Basehore
does not disclose a memory having a look-up table having a
compilation of values derived from executing a fuzzy logic
rule base for the sensed state variables, wherein each of the
look-up table locations stores a value representative of an
output derived from an operation of the fuzzy logic rule base"
(emphasis omitted) (Br9-10; Br14).
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007