Appeal No. 96-0361 Application 08/288,154 Basehore, which we have relied on as a look-up table in the rejection of claims 1 and 32, does not disclose storing pointers to rules. Accordingly, the anticipation rejection of claims 26, 27, 29, and 30 must be reversed. CONCLUSION The rejection of claims 1-4 and 32 is sustained. The rejection of claims 5-9, 26, 27, 29, and 30 is reversed. The rejection of claims 1-4 and 32 is denominated as a new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, "A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review." 37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new - 11 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007