Ex parte BONISSONE et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 96-0361                                                          
          Application 08/288,154                                                      

          Basehore, which we have relied on as a look-up table in the                 
          rejection of claims 1 and 32, does not disclose storing                     
          pointers to rules.  Accordingly, the anticipation rejection of              
          claims 26, 27, 29, and 30 must be reversed.                                 
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               The rejection of claims 1-4 and 32 is sustained.                       
               The rejection of claims 5-9, 26, 27, 29, and 30 is                     
          reversed.                                                                   
               The rejection of claims 1-4 and 32 is denominated as a                 
          new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended              
          effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg.                  
          53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. &                       
          Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR § 1.196(b)               
          provides that, "A new ground of rejection shall not be                      
          considered final for purposes of judicial review."                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    






                                       - 11 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007