THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DONALD L. WOOD
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0405
Application No. 08/178,6681
______________
HEARD: December 10, 1998
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 23
1Application for patent filed January 7, 1994. According
to Appellant this application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/975,217, filed November 12, 1992, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,293,705, issued March 15, 1994; which is a continuation
of Application No. 07/599,488, filed October 18, 1990, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/188,980, filed May 2, 1988, now U.S. Patent No. 4,794,712,
issued January 3, 1989; which is a continuation of Application
No. 06/800,663, filed November 22, 1985, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007