Appeal No. 96-0405
Application No. 08/178,668
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determination which follows.
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 23 through
30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Claim 23 is drawn to a portable display device for
displaying educational or informational material comprising,
inter alia, three panels, each side panel separated from the
center panel by a score line to permit relative movement
between adjacent panels, each score line extends through an
inner corrugated portion to form a flexible hinge between
adjacent panels along the score lines, the width of each side
panel being equal to one-half the width of the center panel to
permit folding of the side panels in substantially co-planar
relationship relative to each other and in substantial
parallel relationship to the center panel to form a
substantially flat, rigid, configuration such that adjacent
one skilled in the art would reasonably have been expected to
draw from the disclosure. See In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826,
159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007