Appeal No. 96-0405 Application No. 08/178,668 claims 23 and 25 would have been suggested by the combined teachings of Anderson in view of Kent, Jr. For reasons set forth, infra, we do not share the examiner’s point of view. When we set aside what appellant has taught us in the present application, and focus our attention upon the collective teachings of Anderson and Kent, Jr., we fail to perceive any suggestion that would have been derived by one of ordinary skill in the art for making the modification proposed. The Anderson patent discloses a window display form formed from a single sheet of material, e.g., ordinary corrugated paper board or double corrugated board. As configured, the window display form was intended to be bent and configured into all sorts of positions and forms to give different effects without the necessity of providing a plurality of separate units. As depicted in Figures 2 and 7, for example, the corrugated fiber board is cut scored to cut the corrugations 3 and the outer surface 4, while leaving the inner surface or back surfaces 5 intact. As shown in Figure 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007