Ex parte TANAKA et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-0462                                                           
          Application 08/165,513                                                       

          could suggest the provision of an electrode having a high                    
          surface resistivity extending over a central portion of an                   
          electrode array, but having sufficient surface conductivity to               
          distribute static electricity over the area of the array, as                 
          required by Claim 1" (Br14).  The Examiner has failed to                     
          establish a prima facie case of obviousness.  The rejection of               
          claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 under § 103 is reversed.                               

























                                        - 10 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007