Ex parte NAKAMURA - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                    
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                      
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                         
               Board.                                                                  
                                                                Paper No. 33           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     ____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     ____________                                      
                              Ex parte SATOSHI NAKAMURA                                
                                     ____________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 96-0616                                   
                             Application No. 08/036,2491                               
                                     ____________                                      
                                HEARD:  March 10, 1999                                 
                                     ____________                                      
          Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                      

          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow                  
          claims 2, 3 and 8 through 10, as amended after a final                       





               Application for patent filed March 24, 1993.1                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007