Appeal No. 96-0616
Application 08/036,249
(Paper No. 23, mailed August 25, 1995), and second
supplemental answer (Paper No. 25, mailed November 13, 1995)
for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the
rejections, and to the
appellant's main brief (Paper No. 17, filed December 21,
1994), reply brief (Paper No. 21, filed June 16, 1995), and
supplemental reply brief (Paper No. 24, filed October 20,
1995) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellant's specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellant and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follow.
Rejection (1)
Kikuchi shows electrical connectors or components C , C ,1 2
and C , each connector including conducting pin terminals 12
3
and 14 arrayed in two rows and extending from a non-conductive
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007