THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 42
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TED Y. TSAI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0647
Application No. 07/871,4011
____________
HEARD: September 16, 1999
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 8, which are
the only claims in this application.
1Application for patent filed June 25, 1992. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/567,409, filed August 14, 1990, now abandoned, which is
a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/348,606, filed
May 5, 1989, now U.S. Patent No. 4,959,124 issued September
25, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007