Ex parte TSAI - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1996-0647                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 07/871,401                                                                                                             


                 Kringstad or Technical News but reverse all other rejections                                                                           
                 for reasons which follow.                                                                                                              
                 OPINION                                                                                                                                
                          A.  The Rejection of Claims 1-3 and 5-8                                                                                       
                          The examiner applies Granum for its teaching of bleaching                                                                     
                 pulp in a D/C-ZEH bleach sequence (Page J26, column 2, bleach                                                                          
                 sequence 4) to produce a pulp with a total organic chloride                                                                            
                 content of less than 5 mg/100 g (Answer, page 3).  The                                                                                 
                 examiner further applies "Technical News" and Kringstad for                                                                            
                 the teaching to use low chlorine multiples  in pulp bleaching              5                                                           
                 to prevent dioxin formation ("Technical News"), or                                                                                     


                 above).  This appears to be an inadvertent error by the                                                                                
                 examiner and appellant was aware of the references applied in                                                                          
                 the rejection of claim 8 (see the Brief, page 5).                                                                                      
                 Accordingly, the examiner’s analysis in the Answer is                                                                                  
                 considered to include Kringstad for every occurrence of Berry                                                                          
                 et al.                                                                                                                                 
                          5Although not necessary for our decision, we note that the                                                                    
                 examiner’s statement regarding the claimed limitation of the                                                                           
                 ratio of "C" factor to ozone has assumed that the artisan                                                                              
                 would lower the amount of chlorine/chlorine dioxide used while                                                                         
                 keeping the amount of ozone constant.  The secondary                                                                                   
                 references to "Technical News" and Kringstad do teach lowering                                                                         
                 the amount of chlorine/chlorine dioxide used in order to                                                                               
                 reduce the formation of chlorinated organics but we find no                                                                            
                 teaching in the record as to the amount of ozone needed if the                                                                         
                 chlorine was reduced.                                                                                                                  
                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007