THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS-GEORG HEINE, RUDOLF SCHOHE-LOOP, THOMAS GLASER,
JEAN MARIE VIKTOR DE VRY, WOLFGANG DOMPERT
and HENNING SOMMERMEYER
__________
Appeal No. 96-0676
Application 07/963,1651
___________
HEARD: August 2, 1999
___________
Before PAK, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1-9 as amended after final rejection and claim 10 which
was added after final rejection. These are all of the claims
1Application for patent filed October 19, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007