THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN K. HOWIE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0875
Application No. 08/169,9181
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the final rejection of claims 1-19.
Representative claims 1 and 17 are reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed December 20, 1993.
According to the appellant, the application is a continuation-
in-part of Application No. 07/968,775, filed on October 30,
1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007