Appeal No. 96-0918 Application 08/059,017 claims 23 to 25, 27 to 31, 33 and 34. Claims 10, 12 and 14 to 17 have been allowed. Claims 18 to 21, the only other remaining claims in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not being readable on the elected invention. Appellants’ invention pertains to a device for cleaning surgical instruments. The subject matter before us on appeal is illustrated by reference to representative claim 23, a copy of which is found in an appendix to appellants’ brief.2 The references of record relied upon by the examiner in support of the rejections are: Larson 2,250,112 Jul. 22, 1941 Nordgren 3,107,665 Oct. 22, 1963 Racioppi 4,945,598 Aug. 7, 1990 Wechsler 515,233 Jun. 13, 1938 (United Kingdom) Claims 23 to 25, 27, 29 to 31 and 33 stand rejected under 2In each of the independent claims on appeal, the height of certain bristles is said to be "of the order of" one-tenth of an inch. Consistent with the original disclosure (page 8, line 22), we interpret same to mean "approximately" one-tenth of an inch. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007