Ex parte MILLER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0918                                                          
          Application 08/059,017                                                      


          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wechsler in view of              
          Larson and Racioppi.                                                        
               Claims 28 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Wechsler in view of Larson and                      
          Racioppi as applied in the rejection of claim 23 et al., and                
          further in view of Nordgren.                                                




                                       OPINION                                        
               According to appellants’ specification, the bristles of                
          the disclosed cleaning device can act to clean surgical                     
          instruments in several ways.  For example, a surgical                       
          instrument can be dragged or pushed across the bristles or                  
          rotated within the bristles to clear the exposed surfaces of                
          the instrument.  Also, the interior of a suction tube can be                
          cleaned by moving the tube vertically up and down over                      
          bristles which enter the tube to dislodge coagulum or the                   
          like.  Emphasis in the specification is placed on forming each              
          bristle to have a non-circular cross-section and one or more                
          vertical sharp edges.  The sharp edges are said to act to                   
          facilitate the scraping action of the bristles and the non-                 
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007