Ex parte UNSIN - Page 3




                     Appeal No. 1996-0941                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/091,421                                                                                                                                            


                     1994                                                                                                                                                              
                     (filed Sep. 23,                                                                                                                                                   
                     1992)                                                                                                                                                             
                     P. Barnes, Structure and Performance of Cements 376-77, 429                                                                                                       
                     (Applied Science Publishers 1983).                                                                                                                                
                                                    References relied upon by appellants                                                                                               
                     McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms 73,                                                                                                      
                     934 (McGraw-Hill, undated).                                                                                                                                       
                     European Standard EN 197-10 (undated).2                                                                                                                           
                                                                            THE REJECTIONS                                                                                             
                                The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                                                                                  
                     follows: claims 15-18 over Braunauer, claims 15, 16 and 18                                                                                                        
                     over Kolar, and claims 15-17 over Crinkelmeyer.  The claims                                                                                                       
                     stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: claim 14 over                                                                                                    
                     Braunauer, claims 14 and 17 over Kolar, and claims 14 and 18                                                                                                      
                     over Crinkelmeyer.  Claims 8-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                                    
                     § 112, first paragraph, on the ground that the specification,                                                                                                     
                     as originally filed, does not provide support for the                                                                                                             



                                2 The examiner does not argue that the undated dictionary                                                                                              
                     definitions and European standard relied upon by appellant are                                                                                                    
                     not indicative of the meanings of the terms therein at the                                                                                                        
                     time appellant’s application was filed.  Accordingly, we                                                                                                          
                     consider the meanings of the terms in those references to be                                                                                                      
                     the meanings of those terms as of appellant’s filing date.                                                                                                        
                                                                                          3                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007