Ex parte JEON et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 96-0974                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/024,299                                                                                                                 


                 result of the abnormality check circuit 9 is displayed on a                                                                            
                 display such as a cathode ray tube (col. 3, lines 9-12).                                                                               
                          The examiner contends  that claim 1's recitation of "line3                                                                                       
                 selecting means for automatically switching transmission of                                                                            
                 data from said defective line to another line" (our emphasis)                                                                          
                 is satisfied by the Kohno reference, citing the following                                                                              
                 passage from column 1, lines 22-27 of the reference: "When the                                                                         
                 decision means determines the existence of abnormality of                                                                              
                 received data transmitted through a certain transmission line,                                                                         
                 the receiver switches the transmission line from the line                                                                              
                 related to abnormal data, to another by means of s changeover                                                                          
                 switch" (our emphasis).  We agree with appellants (Brief at                                                                            
                 13) that the claim language at issue requires the switching to                                                                         
                 occur upstream of the transmission path, not downstream as in                                                                          
                 Kohno.  As a result, Kohno fails to anticipate claim 1.  We                                                                            
                 note that at page 5 of the final Office action,  the examiner                       4                                                  
                 made the following argument with respect to this limitation:                                                                           
                 "Applicant also points out that Kohno switches the receiving                                                                           


                          3Answer at 5.                                                                                                                 
                          4Paper No. 8.                                                                                                                 
                                                                       - 5 -                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007