Appeal No. 96-1106 Application 07/998,721 regard to the merits of this rejection.4 Link discloses a vehicle route planning system 10 which includes data input devices 11 and 12, a navigation computer 13, a road map data memory 14, direction, distance and position sensors 15, an output speaker 16 and an output CRT display 17. As described by Link, in response to system user inputs provided via the input devices 11 and/or 12, the navigation computer 13 will plan a desired route, via fixed roadways defined by the data in the road map memory 14, and store the desired route, at least temporarily, in a route memory location 18 contained in the navigation computer 13. The actual planning of the desired route is accomplished by a route planning module 19 which is part of the navigation computer 13. The module 19 represents specific route planning software programmed into the computer 13. The navigation computer 13 also includes an origin data memory 20, a destination data memory 21 and a detour memory 22 which has at least three subdivisions. One of the detour memory subdivisions is a system detour memory 23, and driver detour and trip detour memories 24 and 25 comprise subsystem 4The record (see Paper No. 19) indicates that the examiner has refused to enter the appellants' reply brief (Paper No. 18). Accordingly, we have not considered the arguments advanced in the reply brief in reviewing the merits of the appealed rejection. -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007