Ex parte YANO et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-1106                                                          
          Application 07/998,721                                                      


               Claims 19 and 20 additionally call for the avoidance                   
          region to be set using a telephone number (claim 19) or a                   
          postal zip code (claim 20).  As indicated above, Link teaches               
          that detour or avoidance regions may be set using a number of               
          different parameters such as intersection, road segment,                    
          entire roadway or geographical region (see the passage from                 
          column 8 reproduced above).  This disclosure of alternative                 
          parameters to set a detour or avoidance region would have                   
          suggested the similar use of other parameters commonly known                
          to be associated with specific areas such as a telephone                    
          number or a postal zip code.                                                
               Thus, the examiner's rejection of claims 19, 20 and 24,                
          to the extent argued by the appellants, is well founded.                    
               In summary and for the above reasons, the decision of the              
          examiner to reject claims 14, 17 through 20, 23 and 24 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed with respect to claims 19, 20 and               
          24, and reversed with respect to claims 14, 17, 18 and 23.                  







                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007