Appeal No. 96-1106 Application 07/998,721 Claims 19 and 20 additionally call for the avoidance region to be set using a telephone number (claim 19) or a postal zip code (claim 20). As indicated above, Link teaches that detour or avoidance regions may be set using a number of different parameters such as intersection, road segment, entire roadway or geographical region (see the passage from column 8 reproduced above). This disclosure of alternative parameters to set a detour or avoidance region would have suggested the similar use of other parameters commonly known to be associated with specific areas such as a telephone number or a postal zip code. Thus, the examiner's rejection of claims 19, 20 and 24, to the extent argued by the appellants, is well founded. In summary and for the above reasons, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 14, 17 through 20, 23 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed with respect to claims 19, 20 and 24, and reversed with respect to claims 14, 17, 18 and 23. -9-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007