THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HIROSHI TOKAILIN, HISAHIRO HIGASHI
and CHISHIO HOSOKAWA
__________
Appeal No. 96-1122
Application 08/087,1341
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WINTERS, DOWNEY and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1Application for patent filed July 2, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07868,726, filed April 14, 1992, now abandoned; which is a
division of Application 07.490,337, filed March 8, 1990, now
U.S. Patent 5, 130,603.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007