Appeal No. 96-1122 Application 08/087,134 THE REFERENCES Matsunaga et al. (Matsunaga) 3,980,713 Sep. 14, 1976 Ueda 4,971,874 Nov. 20, 1990 THE REJECTIONS Claims 2, 3 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(e) as being anticipated by Ueda. Claims 2, 3, 11, 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Ueda in view of Matsunaga. OPINION We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with appellants that the aforementioned rejections are not well founded. Accordingly, we reverse these rejections. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007