Ex parte KAHL et al. - Page 5




              Appeal No. 96-1317                                                                                         
              Application 08/250,302                                                                                     



              claims 7 and 13 on appeal.  However, we are unable to agree with the examiner’s                            
              conclusion of the obviousness of displaying any events scheduled on any day of said                        
              calendar on the calendar itself and to further do so in a vertically stacked manner.                       
              PackRat’s weekly calendar showing for any given day to the upper-right of his figure is                    
              horizontally-based for any day.  The apparent busy bars for the day schedule portion at the                
              bottom of PackRat’s figure appear to be, in one sense, vertically stacked but they are not                 
              shown to be displayed on the overall calendar for the whole month itself.  There is nothing                
              that we can derive from and are not persuaded by the examiner’s reasoning of the                           
              combinability from TIME LINE to modify these depictions.  The GANTT outline shown at the                   
              bottom of page 5-3 of TIME LINE may be construed as vertically stacked, but is arranged                    
              in such a manner as to overlap the days, weeks, and months, and is not taught or                           
              suggested to be depicted on any given monthly calendar.                                                    















                                                           5                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007