THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM T. LIPSEY
________________
Appeal No. 96-1389
Application No. 07/925,6151
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 to 6 and 8. Claims 10 and 11, the
only other claims remaining in the application, have been
1Application for patent filed August 6, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007