Ex parte KUNO et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1518                                                          
          Application No. 08/190,244                                                  


               a gate electrode formed on said channel and insulated                  
          therefrom by said first and/or second insulating layer while                
          being insulated from said pair of channel stoppers by said                  
          second insulating layer; and                                                
               said pair of channel stoppers being electrically                       
          connected to the said source diffusion region to drive said                 
          channel stoppers in synchronism with said gate electrode.                   
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Sauer                         4,603,426                July 29,             
          1986                                                                        
          Yamada                        4,931,850                June  5,             
          1990                                                                        
          Kimura et al. (Kimura)        4,998,161                Mar.  5,             
          1991                                                                        
               Claims 2, 4, 5 and 7 through 12 stand rejected under 35                
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sauer in view of                    
          Kimura and Yamada.                                                          
               Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                  
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               The obviousness rejection is reversed.                                 
               Appellants and the examiner agree that Sauer merely shows              
          a conventional charge detector (Figure 1) with load and drive               
          transistors Q2 and Q3 in a source follower (Brief, page 4;                  
          Answer, page 3).                                                            


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007