THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT B. WARDLE and W. WAYNE EDWARDS
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1529
Application No. 08/233,2191
____________
HEARD: October 19, 1999
____________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
6 through 11 and 13 through 19, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claims 6 and 17 are illustrative:
6. A method of rapidly producing an energetic cyclic ether polymer having
1Application for patent filed April 26, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/880,536, filed May 8, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007