THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WOLFGANG SCHNEIDER and WERNER DROSTE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1598
Application No. 08/206,7431
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 13, 15 to 22 and 25 to 30, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.2
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed March 4, 1994.
2Claim 1 was amended twice after the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007