Ex parte SCHNEIDER et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1996-1598                                                                                     Page 5                        
                 Application No. 08/206,743                                                                                                             


                 to combine the relevant teachings of the references to arrive                                                                          
                 at the claimed invention.  See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071,                                                                              
                 1074, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                                                                            


                          Claim 1 recites a continuous casting apparatus for                                                                            
                 billets to be rolled, comprising, inter alia, a mould, a hot                                                                           
                 top shaping attachment and a starter block.  Claim 1 further                                                                           
                 recites that the starter block comprises a vertically-movable                                                                          
                 block having a continuous peripheral wall having a downwardly                                                                          
                 and inwardly inclined inner surface and a raised portion                                                                               
                 arranged symmetrically relative to the central axes of the                                                                             
                 starter block with the outer surface thereof being inclined                                                                            
                 downwardly towards the inclined surface of the continuous                                                                              
                 wall.  Claim 1 also recites that the raised portion has a                                                                              
                 height which is equal to approximately 1/2 to 2/3 of the                                                                               
                 height of the peripheral wall.5                                                                                                        




                          5This limitation was first presented in an amendment to                                                                       
                 dependent claim 14 in the amendment after final filed May 17,                                                                          
                 1996 (Paper No. 16).  Thereafter, this limitation was                                                                                  
                 incorporated into independent claim 1 in the amendment after                                                                           
                 final filed on October 28, 1996 (Paper No. 21).                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007