Appeal No. 1996-1598 Page 7
Application No. 08/206,743
Thus, the combined teachings of the applied prior art would
not have been suggestive of the now claimed invention.
For the reasons stated above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 1 to 13, 15 to 22 and 25 to 30 under
35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007