Ex parte MILESKI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1637                                                          
          Application 08/130,940                                                      


                    The invention pertains to an antenna.  Claim 1 is                 
          illustrative and reads as follows:                                          
                    1.   A system for receiving and transmitting radio                
          signals in high latitude regions where the environment includes             
          sea ice, said system comprising:                                            
                    an antenna for transmitting and receiving substantially           
          vertically polarized radio waves, said antenna being formed from a          
          wire; and                                                                   
                    said antenna being deployed on and extending along an             
          upper surface of said sea ice.                                              
                    The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence            
          of obviousness are:                                                         
          Rogers et al. (Rogers)          1,322,622              Nov. 25,             
          1919                                                                        
          Hine                        GB 2 140 215A              Nov. 21,             
          1984                                                                        
          (British Patent Document)                                                   
                                                                                     
                    Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second            
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point            
          out and distinctly claim the subject matter which appellants                
          regard as their invention.                                                  
                    Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Hine taken alone or in combination with             
          Rogers.                                                                     

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007